Archive for the 'Health Care Reform' Category

10 reasons why we can’t ignore health care costs

Many of us have heard the mantra our whole careers: To improve health—and the quality of American life—we must stem the rising cost of care. Health care’s percentage of the U.S. gross domestic product has doubled since 1980. At this rate, by 2040, health care will consume one of every three dollars.

With a U.S. debt crisis and a presidential election looming—and with Group Health paying continually rising prices for care purchased outside our own group practice—the cost-containment drumbeat can seem deafening. But here are 10 reasons why rising costs matter now more than ever:

1. Dollars spent on health care could go to education and other needs.
As former White House Advisor Ezekiel Emanuel, MD, PhD, recently wrote, “The more we spend on health care, the less we can spend on other things we value…middle-class salaries, public education, and other state-funded services.” Money spent on any of those things may promote health more than spending the same on medicine. Also, health care-related debts are weakening American businesses’ ability to compete globally.

2. Lower costs will let more Americans gain access to care.
When insurance premiums rise with the cost of care, fewer people can afford coverage. Emanuel predicted that even after the Affordable Care Act starts providing coverage for the uninsured through Medicaid and subsidies in 2014, some people will still find coverage unaffordable. But bending the curve of cost increases should allow more Americans into the system.

3. Lower costs can be compatible with better care.
Group Health proved this true in our patient-centered medical home evaluation. Results included lower costs, higher quality, fewer hospitalizations and emergency visits, and better patient and provider experiences. Ongoing research seeks to identify more innovations that cut costs while maintaining or improving quality.

4. We know where the money is.
Studies show that the greatest potential for health care savings comes from reducing avoidable hospitalization and improving care for chronic conditions. In the Journal of the American Medical Association, Emanuel recently outlined needed changes, including many under development and/or evaluation at Group Health:

  • tracking patients’ health status and physician performance with electronic health records
  • more intensive interactions between patients, caregivers, and clinic staff, including using care coordinators, 24/7 access, interventions to increase medication adherence, and specialized clinical services for patients with recurrent problems from chronic disease
  • providing services not traditionally covered by fee-for-service reimbursement, such as e-mail, wireless monitoring to increase medication adherence, home evaluations to minimize falls, and lifestyle interventions to improve nutrition and exercise

5. We’re uniquely positioned to help solve the problem.
As a learning health care system conducting non-proprietary research within an integrated health plan, we can study the processes and costs of care and coverage for a large population getting care in real-world clinical settings. This lets us continually refine our ability to design, implement, evaluate, and disseminate innovations that may reduce care costs for Group Health members and others across the United States.

6. We’ve got the connections.
Through Group Health Research Institute’s links to other organizations in the HMO Research Network and other consortia—and our collaborations with universities and medical centers nationwide—we can extend the diversity, power, and reach of our research on costs.

7. It’s the future.
The new Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation shows increasing interest in funding research to make care more efficient. Also, the establishment of accountable care organizations (ACOs)—as outlined in the Affordable Care Act—provides new incentives for cost-conscious health care.

8. Improvements are possible.
Other developed nations prove it’s possible to provide higher-quality care at lower cost. Among further glimmers of hope: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published a study last month showing a dramatic decrease in amputations among people with diabetes over the past decade, presumably because of better disease control. Such improvements should result in lower costs too.

9. We’re poised to address the problem.
At the Group Health Research Advisory Board Annual Meeting on January 25, leaders from Group Health and our collaborating institutions affirmed GHRI’s recently completed strategic plan. They encouraged the Institute to be more ambitious about solving cost control challenges—for both Group Health and the nation. So a small working group of Group Health leaders will meet soon to plan how GHRI will intensify efforts in cost-related research.

10. It’s our job.
GHRI’s mission is “to improve health and health care for everyone through leading-edge research, innovation, and evaluation.” Reducing costs of care is a pillar of this effort.

The best ways information technology can support health delivery systems

An important bi-partisan report was released today that includes a set of recommendations for the most effective use of health information technology (IT) dollars to support coordinated, accountable, patient-centered models of care. We were fortunate enough to have our President and CEO, Scott Armstrong, contribute to this work through the Bipartisan Policy Center’s Task Force on Delivery System Reform and Health Information Technology. Over the last six months, the Task Force, headed by Senators Daschle and Frist, has collaborated across industries and party lines to develop a set of recommendations for the most effective use of health IT dollars to support new models of care that improve quality and health, and reduce costs. Continue reading ‘The best ways information technology can support health delivery systems’

Group Health signs on to support gay marriage bill

Group Health has joined other local Northwest companies in signing a letter to legislative leaders and Gov. Chris Gregoire in supporting gay marriage legislation (SB 6239) that will be debated during the current legislative session. Other organizations that signed the letter included Vulcan, Nike, RealNetworks, Concur, and Microsoft.

I believe the support for committed couples is part of respecting our staff and our patients. Respect for all people is a core value of Group Health. Inclusion and equality help build a workforce that reflects and can support the diverse needs of the patients we serve.

“We support our people, both our staff and our patients, and we also support human rights as guaranteed to all citizens of this country,” said Michael Soman, MD, Chief Medical Executive Officer, and President of Group Health Physicians. “Close collaboration and respect, with our colleagues and our patients, are critical to creating better health for individuals and communities.”

Group Health’s position builds on its history of supporting corporate and public policies that promote inclusion and equality. Group Health was recently recognized in the Healthcare Equality Index for its leadership in meeting high-quality standards in serving the LGBT community in its 25 statewide medical centers. The standards include some basic services such as visitation rights and patient non-discrimination policies

Holiday greetings from the Chair of the Cooperative

This has always been one of my favorite times of year, especially those rare clear cold days when cheeks are rosy and we truly appreciate every second of daylight. Something about the days of diminishing light lend themselves towards introspection and reflection, all the better to plan our intentions for the coming new year. 

Your consumer Board of Trustees has been busy reflecting on 2011 and planning for the future. As part of that reflection process, we’ve considered the Cooperative’s journey from its creation in the great cooperative movement of the post-war years, and coming of age in the turbulent second half of the twentieth century. Our annual membership meetings were lively and exuberant affairs where many important discussions took place.

We’ve been looking at ways to recapture that spirit of engagement in our Group Health as we celebrate the International Year of the Cooperative. Things have changed since 1947, but our members still care deeply about their health and that of their families and communities. Our job for 2012 is to find ways for our members to engage with their Cooperative in ways that work for today’s lifestyles.  As I said at the Annual Meeting, you’ll be hearing more about that in months to come.

In the meantime, with thanks for your continued enthusiasm for Group Health Cooperative, I wish you a holiday season filled with good health.

America can’t control health costs it doesn’t understand

Deliberations over health care’s future continue to be divisive. The U.S. Senate “super committee”—deadlocked over deficits linked largely to health care spending—has thrown in the towel. The Affordable Care Act is headed for the U.S. Supreme Court. Medicare chief Don Berwick has resigned after Congress failed to confirm his appointment. And pundits predict next year’s presidential election will be yet another referendum on health reform. Continue reading ‘America can’t control health costs it doesn’t understand’

Region’s ER facility expansion will drive up costs

The Seattle Times shed important light on a disturbing development in the region’s health care market with its November 29 story, “ER building boom is wrong prescription, critics say.” Experienced ethics reporter Carol Ostrom describes how large hospitals have recently built many new, aggressively marketed emergency facilities—many as free-standing facilities in affluent areas of Puget Sound. Continue reading ‘Region’s ER facility expansion will drive up costs’

Supercommittee fails to reach an agreement — what now?

After many committee meetings and much speculation whether the bipartisan Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction (“Supercommittee”) would come to an agreement to cut the United Stated deficit by $1.2 trillion, the deadline has unfortunately past. Despite the fact that the Supercommittee had full authority to essentially cut from any government budget to reach the $1.2 trillion goal, the Democrats and Republicans could not agree on exactly how to reform certain programs for savings nor develop creative ways to raise revenue without increasing taxes for everyone. Our own Senator Patty Murray, a co-chair of the Supercommittee, stated that the group worked up to the wire to strike a deal, but in the end, no recommendation could be agreed upon by both parties. Continue reading ‘Supercommittee fails to reach an agreement — what now?’

Performance Matters

Only nine Medicare Advantage plans in the country earned 5 stars overall, and Group Health Cooperative’s plan is one of them.

Numbers are the currency of the land—the best way we have to demonstrate accountability and transparency regarding how we take care of people. But over the years our concept of quality has evolved beyond just scores and numbers. Continue reading ‘Performance Matters’

HHS Releases Final ACO Rules

After much anticipation and an outpouring of feedback on the proposed rule released last March, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released its final rule on the Accountable Care Medicare Shared Savings Program late last week. This program was created by one of a few key delivery system reform provisions in the health care reform law, to better align financial incentives in Fee-For-Service Medicare to strive for cost savings while protecting and improving quality of care. Provider groups had many concerns with the proposed rule, largely stemming from the lack of flexibility in initial funding that is required to develop a new ACO model and keep it running. The general analysis was that the potential upside offered through the program would not be sufficient to support the development of ACOs in the Medicare Fee-For-Service market – and the potential downside risk too great. Continue reading ‘HHS Releases Final ACO Rules’

If less is more, which health care should be cut?

In a national survey of primary care physicians that the Archives of Internal Medicine published last month, nearly half agreed: Their own patients are getting too much care.

The study drew widespread attention as Americans struggle with health care’s drag on our economy. At Group Health’s Annual Membership Meeting, Commonwealth Fund President Karen Davis, PhD, said the United States is paying twice as much per capita for health care as other industrialized countries. Yet 15 nations outrank us in quality of care. Clearly, we could do better with less. But how do we decide which care to eliminate? Continue reading ‘If less is more, which health care should be cut?’