Author Archive for Eric Larson, MD, MPH

10 reasons why we can’t ignore health care costs

Many of us have heard the mantra our whole careers: To improve health—and the quality of American life—we must stem the rising cost of care. Health care’s percentage of the U.S. gross domestic product has doubled since 1980. At this rate, by 2040, health care will consume one of every three dollars.

With a U.S. debt crisis and a presidential election looming—and with Group Health paying continually rising prices for care purchased outside our own group practice—the cost-containment drumbeat can seem deafening. But here are 10 reasons why rising costs matter now more than ever:

1. Dollars spent on health care could go to education and other needs.
As former White House Advisor Ezekiel Emanuel, MD, PhD, recently wrote, “The more we spend on health care, the less we can spend on other things we value…middle-class salaries, public education, and other state-funded services.” Money spent on any of those things may promote health more than spending the same on medicine. Also, health care-related debts are weakening American businesses’ ability to compete globally.

2. Lower costs will let more Americans gain access to care.
When insurance premiums rise with the cost of care, fewer people can afford coverage. Emanuel predicted that even after the Affordable Care Act starts providing coverage for the uninsured through Medicaid and subsidies in 2014, some people will still find coverage unaffordable. But bending the curve of cost increases should allow more Americans into the system.

3. Lower costs can be compatible with better care.
Group Health proved this true in our patient-centered medical home evaluation. Results included lower costs, higher quality, fewer hospitalizations and emergency visits, and better patient and provider experiences. Ongoing research seeks to identify more innovations that cut costs while maintaining or improving quality.

4. We know where the money is.
Studies show that the greatest potential for health care savings comes from reducing avoidable hospitalization and improving care for chronic conditions. In the Journal of the American Medical Association, Emanuel recently outlined needed changes, including many under development and/or evaluation at Group Health:

  • tracking patients’ health status and physician performance with electronic health records
  • more intensive interactions between patients, caregivers, and clinic staff, including using care coordinators, 24/7 access, interventions to increase medication adherence, and specialized clinical services for patients with recurrent problems from chronic disease
  • providing services not traditionally covered by fee-for-service reimbursement, such as e-mail, wireless monitoring to increase medication adherence, home evaluations to minimize falls, and lifestyle interventions to improve nutrition and exercise

5. We’re uniquely positioned to help solve the problem.
As a learning health care system conducting non-proprietary research within an integrated health plan, we can study the processes and costs of care and coverage for a large population getting care in real-world clinical settings. This lets us continually refine our ability to design, implement, evaluate, and disseminate innovations that may reduce care costs for Group Health members and others across the United States.

6. We’ve got the connections.
Through Group Health Research Institute’s links to other organizations in the HMO Research Network and other consortia—and our collaborations with universities and medical centers nationwide—we can extend the diversity, power, and reach of our research on costs.

7. It’s the future.
The new Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation shows increasing interest in funding research to make care more efficient. Also, the establishment of accountable care organizations (ACOs)—as outlined in the Affordable Care Act—provides new incentives for cost-conscious health care.

8. Improvements are possible.
Other developed nations prove it’s possible to provide higher-quality care at lower cost. Among further glimmers of hope: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published a study last month showing a dramatic decrease in amputations among people with diabetes over the past decade, presumably because of better disease control. Such improvements should result in lower costs too.

9. We’re poised to address the problem.
At the Group Health Research Advisory Board Annual Meeting on January 25, leaders from Group Health and our collaborating institutions affirmed GHRI’s recently completed strategic plan. They encouraged the Institute to be more ambitious about solving cost control challenges—for both Group Health and the nation. So a small working group of Group Health leaders will meet soon to plan how GHRI will intensify efforts in cost-related research.

10. It’s our job.
GHRI’s mission is “to improve health and health care for everyone through leading-edge research, innovation, and evaluation.” Reducing costs of care is a pillar of this effort.

America can’t control health costs it doesn’t understand

Deliberations over health care’s future continue to be divisive. The U.S. Senate “super committee”—deadlocked over deficits linked largely to health care spending—has thrown in the towel. The Affordable Care Act is headed for the U.S. Supreme Court. Medicare chief Don Berwick has resigned after Congress failed to confirm his appointment. And pundits predict next year’s presidential election will be yet another referendum on health reform. Continue reading ‘America can’t control health costs it doesn’t understand’

Region’s ER facility expansion will drive up costs

The Seattle Times shed important light on a disturbing development in the region’s health care market with its November 29 story, “ER building boom is wrong prescription, critics say.” Experienced ethics reporter Carol Ostrom describes how large hospitals have recently built many new, aggressively marketed emergency facilities—many as free-standing facilities in affluent areas of Puget Sound. Continue reading ‘Region’s ER facility expansion will drive up costs’

If less is more, which health care should be cut?

In a national survey of primary care physicians that the Archives of Internal Medicine published last month, nearly half agreed: Their own patients are getting too much care.

The study drew widespread attention as Americans struggle with health care’s drag on our economy. At Group Health’s Annual Membership Meeting, Commonwealth Fund President Karen Davis, PhD, said the United States is paying twice as much per capita for health care as other industrialized countries. Yet 15 nations outrank us in quality of care. Clearly, we could do better with less. But how do we decide which care to eliminate? Continue reading ‘If less is more, which health care should be cut?’

Health care’s elusive big idea: Less is more

Americans are drowning in data while starving for transformational ideas. So writes Neal Gabler in his August 13 New York Times piece, “The Elusive Big Idea.”

Think Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, Marshall McLuhan’s “medium is the message,” and Betty Friedan’s “feminine mystique.” Concepts like these let us “get our minds around our existence and attempt to answer the big daunting questions of our lives,” wrote Gabler, of the University of Southern California. Such visionary ideas could once “ignite fires of debate, incite revolutions, and fundamentally change the way we look at and think about the world.”  Continue reading ‘Health care’s elusive big idea: Less is more’

Avoiding ‘optimism bias’ as U.S. budget remains uncertain

Even when Democrats and Republicans agree on little else, they always come together to support funding for medical research.” It’s a long-held belief among health researchers. But this year is different.

After months of intense political wrangling over the nation’s debt ceiling, it’s hard to predict what might happen next. We know that Congress will soon require big cuts across many federal departments—including those that provide 80 percent of Group Health Research Institute (GHRI)’s revenue. Most of our budget comes from multi-year grants, so our immediate outlook is OK. But we must prepare now for a near future with less federal money. Although we don’t know yet where the cuts will be, I fear that medical and health care research—characterized as discretionary—is at risk.  Continue reading ‘Avoiding ‘optimism bias’ as U.S. budget remains uncertain’

Of mystery shoppers, country doctors, and a meeting with Bill Clinton

Last month, the federal government disclosed—then quickly abandoned—a plan to unleash “mystery shoppers”on 4,000 primary care practices across the United States. The goal? To see just how many providers refuse to take new Medicare and Medicaid patients.  Continue reading ‘Of mystery shoppers, country doctors, and a meeting with Bill Clinton’

Dr. Reid represents Group Health at Bill Clinton job summit

 Rob Reid, MD, PhD, Group Health associate medical director for research and knowledge translation, represented Group Health at the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) America meeting on U.S. economic recovery and job growth in Chicago June 29-30.  Continue reading ‘Dr. Reid represents Group Health at Bill Clinton job summit’

From waste to value-conscious innovation: can Group Health show the way?

Audiences at Group Health’s annual Birnbaum Lecture often remember speakers for the challenging questions they raise. Take this year. On May 11, Canadian economist Robert G. Evans, PhD, praised Group Health for our idea-driven success. But then he asked: “If Group Health has a better mousetrap, why isn’t the world beating a path to your door?” And “Why is the whole U.S. health care system not dominated by organizations like Group Health?” When an audience member asked how to educate American voters about solutions to the health-cost crisis, he joked: “We (Canadians) have just elected a government that’s going to wipe out our Medicare system. Why are you asking me?”  Continue reading ‘From waste to value-conscious innovation: can Group Health show the way?’

Now’s the time: Award and endowment hail

This month, Group Health Research Institute (GHRI) applauds two remarkable honors for Dr. Ed Wagner, our Institute’s founding director (1983–1998) who now heads GHRI’s MacColl Institute for Healthcare Innovation.

Ed was chosen to receive the 2011 William B. Graham Prize, the highest national recognition for health services researchers. (Among previous winners are Princeton’s Uwe Reinhardt, Dartmouth’s John Wennberg, Stanford’s Alain Enthoven, University of British Columbia’s Bob Evans, and Don Berwick, founder of the Institute for Health Improvement and acting leader of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services.)  Continue reading ‘Now’s the time: Award and endowment hail’